Page
|
Title
|
|
3–5 |
Fossil embryos deep in the fossil record
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
|
5–6 |
Big birdosaur blues: new fossil creates problems for dino-to-bird evolution
Perspective by Shaun Doyle |
|
6–8 |
Naracoorte Caves: an archive in the dark
Perspective by Emil Silvestru |
|
8–11 |
Katrina’s splay deposits: a small example of the power of flowing water
Perspective by Tas Walker |
|
11–12 |
Feathery flight of fancy: alleged ‘protofeathers’ fail under close scrutiny
Perspective by Shaun Doyle |
|
12–14 |
Migrating planets and migrating theories
Perspective by Wayne Spencer |
|
15–16 |
Evolutionary origin of life even more difficult
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
|
17 |
No more love for Lucy?
Perspective by Ryan Jaroncyk |
|
18 |
Terrible lizards trapped by terrible Flood
Perspective by Tas Walker |
|
19–23 |
Astronomical troubles for the astronomical hypothesis of ice ages
Overview by Michael J. Oard |
|
24–26 |
Evidence for turtle evolution
Overview Jerry Bergman and Wayne Frair |
|
27–31 |
Florid forensic fable
A review of The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution
by Sean B. Carroll
Book Review by Alex Williams |
|
32–36 |
Still discontent
A review of Darwinism and Its Discontents by Michael Ruse
Book Review by Lael Weinberger |
|
37–43 |
Sloppy, lazy and dishonest
A review of Science and Faith: Friends or Foes? by C. John Collins
Book Review by Andrew Kulikovsky |
|
44–46 |
Strong case, but flawed by compromise
A review of The Case for a Creator by Lee Strobel
Book Review by Lita Cosner |
|
47–52 |
String Theory—causing a disturbance of cosmic proportions
A review of The Cosmic Landscape by Leonard Susskind
Book Review by Mary Beth De Repentigny |
|
52–54 |
A pathetic case for an old earth
A review of A Biblical Case for an Old Earth by David Snoke
Book Review by Lita Cosner |
|
55–57 |
The HAR1F gene: a Darwinian paradox
Countering the Critics Article by Peter Borger and Royal Truman |
|
58–60 |
The Flood/post-Flood boundary
Letter to the Editor by Max J. Hunter. Reply: Michael Oard |
|
60–61 |
WMAP ‘noisy’ data?
Letter to the Editor by James Upton |
|
61 |
Biblical chronology—our times are in his hands
Letter to the Editor by Larry Pierce. Reply: Mike Viccary |
|
61–62 |
The problems of traditional chronology
Letter to the Editor by Rod Bernitt |
|
62–66 |
‘Short’ sojourn comes up short?
Letter to the Editor by Brenton Minge. Replies: Mike Viccary and David Austin
|
|
66–68 |
Pioneer anomaly: still unsolved?
Letter to the Editor by James Upton. Reply: Russell Humphreys |
|
68 |
Tidal considerations
Letter to the Editor by Jack C. Sofield. Reply: JoC Editors |
|
69–76 |
Days 1–4
Viewpoint by Frank DeRemer, Mark Amunrud and Delmar Dobberpuhl |
|
77–83 |
Life’s irreducible structure—Part 2: naturalistic objections
Paper by Alex Williams |
|
84–92 |
Genetic code optimisation: Part 2
Paper by Royal Truman and Peter Borger |
|
93–101 |
On literary theorists’ approach to Genesis 1: Part 2
Paper by Marc Kay |
|
102–110 |
Haeckel: legacy of fraud to popularise evolution
Paper by Pauli J. Ojala and Matti Leisola |
|
111–117 |
Astonishing DNA complexity demolishes neo-Darwinism
Paper by Alex Williams |
|
118–127 |
Why the shared mutations in the Hominidae exon X GULO pseudogene are not evidence
for common descent
Paper by Royal Truman and Peter Borger |
