Page
|
Title
|
|
3–4 |
Water inside fire
Perspective by Emil Silvestru |
|
5 |
Modern-looking lampreys ‘older’ than thought
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
|
5–7 |
Myriad mechanisms of gene regulation
Perspective by Alex Williams |
|
8 |
Morphology and molecules in conflict yet again
Perspective by Reinhard Junker |
|
9–11 |
Curved spines and pregnant primates
Perspective by Carl Wieland |
|
11–12 |
Dinosaur demise did not jump start mammal evolution
Perspective by Michael J. Oard |
|
12–14 |
Wild, wild floods!
Perspective by Emil Silvestru |
|
15–16 |
Virus has powerful mini-motor to pack up its DNA
Perspective by Jonathan Sarfati |
|
17–19 |
How did 90% of large Australian Ice Age animals go extinct?
Overview by Michael J. Oard |
|
20–23 |
Fighting fire with fire
A review of Deluded by Dawkins? A Christian Response to The God Delusion
by Andrew Wilson
Book Review by Lael Weinberger |
|
23–27 |
A foundation with a few cracks
A review of Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview
by J.P. Moreland and William Lane Craig
Book Review by Andrew Kulikovsky |
|
28–33 |
Clarity and confusion
A review of The Edge of Evolution: the Search for the Limits of Darwinism
by Michael J. Behe
Book Review by Don Batten |
|
33–36 |
Designed to inhabit the earth
A review of The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma by Marc W. Kirschner and John C. Gerhart
Book Review by Jean K. Lightner |
|
37–40 |
Long tails, tall tales
A review of The Ancestor’s Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution by Richard Dawkins
Book Review by Lael Wei nberger |
|
41–43 |
Is the human pharynx poorly designed?
Countering the Critics Article by Jerry Bergman |
|
44–49 |
Creationism, science and peer review
Countering the Critics Article by Andrew S. Kulikovsky |
|
50 |
Supersaturated magma may be significant for granite formation
Letter to the Editor by Tom Heinze. Reply: Tas Walker |
|
50–52 |
Volcanoes during Creation Week
Letter to the Editor by Raul Esperante. Reply: Tas Walker |
|
52–54 |
Time and infinity
Letter to the Editor by Matthew Dingemans. Reply: Andrew Kulikovsky |
|
54–56 |
Explaining the Pioneer effect?
Letter to the Editor by William Worraker. Reply: Russell Humphreys |
|
56–57 |
Just plain ordinary water?
Letter to the Editor by D. Russell Humphreys. Reply: Frank DeRemer, Delmar Dobberpuhl and Mark Amunrud |
|
58–60 |
215-year sojourn still short
Letter to the Editor by Brenton Minge. Reply: : David Austin and Mike Viccary |
|
61 |
Biblical chronology
Letter to the Editor by Arthur F. Green
|
|
62–64 |
How long was Noah on the Ark?
Viewpoint by Mark L. Howard |
|
65–72 |
Precambrian geology and the Bible: a harmony
Viewpoint by Harry Dickens and Andrew A. Snelling |
|
73–80 |
The language faculty: following the evidence
Paper by Fred Field |
|
81–84 |
Patterns of change over time: organophosphorus resistance in the Australian sheep blowfly
Paper by Jean K Lightner |
|
85–92 |
Facilitated variation: A new paradigm emerges in biology
Paper by Alex Williams |
|
93–98 |
Geological pioneer was a biblical creationist
Paper by Tas Walker |
|
99–110 |
Genome truncation vs mutational opportunity: can new
genes arise via gene duplication?—Part 1
Paper by Royal Truman and Peter Borger |
|
111–119 |
Genome truncation vs mutational opportunity: can new
genes arise via gene duplication?—Part 2
Paper by Royal Truman and Peter Borger |
|
120–127 |
Whose god? The theological response to the god-of-the-gaps
Essay by Lael Weinberger |
