One of the basic tenets of science is that open-mindedness is critically important, and the evidence should be followed wherever it may lead. But some scientists say that we should not always be so open-minded, and that some conclusions should not be allowed, even if demanded by all the evidence.
They say that no matter how much evidence there is for ingenious design in life, in the structure of the universe, or in libraries full of encoded information in genomes, they must not even consider the possibility that God might have had anything to do with the creation of such wonders.
One scientist said; "Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic." But this simply reveals a philosophical bias against God.
Many highly qualified scientists believe the Bible's account of creation provides a much better explanation for the existence and operation of the universe.
Hey! Cookies don't take millions of years to evolve.
Creation.com uses cookies to provide a better experience.