Is experimental science overrated?

Is there a middle ground between thousands and billions of years? Can the earth be hundreds of thousands of years old?

Life looks like it was designed. Is that impression nothing more than like seeing bunnies in clouds?

Christians and atheists have presuppositions that affect how we interpret facts and evidence.

We humans may think our self-awareness marks us out as special but atheists insist it’s merely an illusion brought about by our brain chemistry. Why, then, do cognitive scientists, psychologists and philosophers fail to explain consciousness?

Taking apart the argument that says consciousness, rather than being a product of the supernatural soul, emerges from the complex physical structure of our brains

Does it give us a timetable? Does it give us the mechanics of how the parts came together?

A Christian advocate of millions of years of death and ‘natural evil’ before Adam is challenged to answer the dilemma this poses, namely that it implies that the Creator God is a moral monster.

Could Noah’s Ark have been a giant coracle, as claimed by British Museum curator Irving Finkel in his translation of a Babylonian tablet?

Evolution, it is claimed, removes the need for a designing intelligence of life on Earth, but this amounts to the logically absurd proposition of ‘Unintelligent Design’.

Retired anti-creationist professor gives grade ‘F’ advice to followers.

What should we be aware of as we try to read the secular literature with a careful and critical eye?