A brief response to anti-creationist books
A brief response to anti-creationist books
critics
Back to Topics
A skeptic falsely accuses creationists of lying about human and ape similarities
An evolutionist accuses creationists of lying, but the accusation proves to be utterly false and instead reflects badly on the accuser.
Dawkins’ Ironic Hypocrisy
Misotheists like Dawkins attack creationist teachings, but give credence to wacky
ideas like ‘Jesus never existed’ rejected by historians. Other antitheists
like Bill Maher hold even wackier views, e.g. rejecting germ theory.
Newton was a creationist only because there was no alternative?
Most branches of science were founded by biblical creationists. Some skeptics claim that there was no evolutionary alternative.
Genesis contradictions?
Skeptics claim that the order of creation in Genesis 2 is different to that in chapter 1. But is it?
New England Journal of Medicine promotes anti-theism
New England Journal of Medicine promotes anti-theism
How religiously neutral are the anti-creationist organisations?
The NCSE is vehemently opposed to Christians who believe the Biblical account of history, from the beginning. Is that ‘religiously neutral’?
The ‘Indoctrinator’
Indoctrination at universities
The Skeptics and their ‘Churchian’ Allies
The Skeptics and their ‘Churchian’ Allies