The positive case for creation
Creationists are not merely anti-evolution. We are pro-Bible, and advance constructive arguments for biblical creation. Here’s the evidence.
Apologetics
Back to Topics
Carol Cleland’s case for historical science—part 1: devaluing experimental science
Is experimental science overrated?
Design: just a trick of the mind?
Life looks like it was designed. Is that impression nothing more than like seeing bunnies in clouds?
Missing? or misinterpreted?
The parable of the cupboard and Genesis 1:29–30
A simple parable to help you in your conversations with Christian old-earthers.
Is bias a bad thing?
Christians and atheists have presuppositions that affect how we interpret facts and evidence.
Hybrid approaches to Creation
Is there a middle ground between thousands and billions of years? Can the earth be hundreds of thousands of years old?
How do we account for so many species of beetles if Noah’s Flood was only 4,500 years ago?
How do we account for so many species of beetles if Noah’s Flood was only 4,500 years ago?
Historical Science, Chaos Theory, and the sliding scale of trust
What can the famed character Ian Malcolm from Jurassic Park teach us about forensic investigations and historical science?
'Why do you just bash evolution?'
Does CMI just bash evolution? Learn about both the positive and negative arguments in biblical apologetics.
Is ignorance bliss?
Ignoring the challenge of biblical creation may seem a sound decision if you think it is not scientific. But is it? Would you risk eternity on it?
Disconnected from reality
Why the trend to move away from the solid truth of God’s Word to subjective moods and feelings?